I work with many companies in which the storage and server/platform teams have to sign in blood in order to receive suitable access to perform their day to day work. In fact, for some organisations, it can equate to 50% or more of their time. I’ve been there and I understand and have experienced the [...]
Continue Reading This Post →Following on from the “inadvertent” loss of 25 million personal records, it appears that good old Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs have decided that online tax filing is not as secure as they may have indicated in the past (see BBC link). High profile celebrities, MPs and the Royal Family [...]
Continue Reading This Post →I’ve been mulling over for some time whether to purchase/evaluate the Drobo storage device. Up to now I’ve been put off by the lack of NAS support, as the device only supports USB2.0. However all that has changed; I read today that there’s now the [...]
Continue Reading This Post →EMC made two DMX-4 announcements today. At the top end, the first details solid state drives which replace standard spinning HDDs. At the bottom end the second announces new 1TB SATA-II drives (and other miscellaneous stuff).
The solid state hard drive (or as Continue Reading This Post →
In a previous post earlier this year I mentioned the Onaro purchase by Network Appliance. As I said at the time, I wasn’t aware Onaro’s SANScreen product even had a NAS module. It seems I was wrong, and thanks for [...]
Continue Reading This Post →I thought I would spend some time tonight looking back at my blogging history. I first started writing stuff on a website I created called Storage Eye. The first “article” I wrote was posted in February 2002, almost 6 years ago. It was pretty crude stuff (the presentation, not the content), simply putting static pages [...]
Continue Reading This Post →Following on from BarryW’s comment to my XiV post, I’ve been thinking over how the XiVarchitecture works. When a disk fails and the missing mirrors need to be recreated, then the data is likely to exist across all or most of the configured drives. Logically it would make sense that the target for the new [...]
Continue Reading This Post →Subscribe to Architecting IT
Popular Posts
- Netapp: The Inflexibility of Flexvols (9,960)
- Windows Server 2012 (Windows Server “8″) – Storage Spaces (9,397)
- Enterprise Computing: Why Thin Provisioning Is Not The Holy Grail for Utilisation (7,853)
- Comparing iSCSI Targets – Microsoft, StarWind, iSCSI Cake and Kernsafe – Part I (5,826)
- Review: Compellent Storage Center – Part II (5,464)
- Data ONTAP 8.0 – Part III (5,060)
- Why Does Microsoft Hyper-V Not Support NFS? (4,884)
- Back to Blogging (4,451)
- How To: Enable iSNS Server in Windows 2008 (4,338)
- Windows Server 2012 (Windows Server “8″) – Virtual Fibre Channel (4,158)
Daily Popular
- Hitachi Attacks Migration Costs with Non-Disruptive Migration Feature (16)
- ViPR – Frankenstorage Revisited (14)
- Why Does Microsoft Hyper-V Not Support NFS? (14)
- How To: Enable iSNS Server in Windows 2008 (13)
- Netapp: The Inflexibility of Flexvols (13)
- Comparing iSCSI Targets – Microsoft, StarWind, iSCSI Cake and Kernsafe – Part I (11)
- Enterprise Computing: Why Thin Provisioning Is Not The Holy Grail for Utilisation (11)
- Windows Server 2012 (Windows Server “8″) – Storage Spaces (10)
- Windows Server 2012 (Windows Server “8″) – Virtual Fibre Channel (8)
- Understanding EVA (7)


